|
|
Pedro Martins, Paulo Carvalho, & Carlo Gatta. (2012). Context Aware Keypoint Extraction for Robust Image Representation. In 23rd British Machine Vision Conference (100.pp. 1–100.12).
|
|
|
|
Jon Almazan, Albert Gordo, Alicia Fornes, & Ernest Valveny. (2012). Efficient Exemplar Word Spotting. In 23rd British Machine Vision Conference (67.pp. 1–67.11).
Abstract: In this paper we propose an unsupervised segmentation-free method for word spotting in document images.
Documents are represented with a grid of HOG descriptors, and a sliding window approach is used to locate the document regions that are most similar to the query. We use the exemplar SVM framework to produce a better representation of the query in an unsupervised way. Finally, the document descriptors are precomputed and compressed with Product Quantization. This offers two advantages: first, a large number of documents can be kept in RAM memory at the same time. Second, the sliding window becomes significantly faster since distances between quantized HOG descriptors can be precomputed. Our results significantly outperform other segmentation-free methods in the literature, both in accuracy and in speed and memory usage.
|
|
|
|
Naila Murray, Luca Marchesotti, & Florent Perronnin. (2012). Learning to Rank Images using Semantic and Aesthetic Labels. In 23rd British Machine Vision Conference (110.pp. 1–110.10).
Abstract: Most works on image retrieval from text queries have addressed the problem of retrieving semantically relevant images. However, the ability to assess the aesthetic quality of an image is an increasingly important differentiating factor for search engines. In this work, given a semantic query, we are interested in retrieving images which are semantically relevant and score highly in terms of aesthetics/visual quality. We use large-margin classifiers and rankers to learn statistical models capable of ordering images based on the aesthetic and semantic information. In particular, we compare two families of approaches: while the first one attempts to learn a single ranker which takes into account both semantic and aesthetic information, the second one learns separate semantic and aesthetic models. We carry out a quantitative and qualitative evaluation on a recently-published large-scale dataset and we show that the second family of techniques significantly outperforms the first one.
|
|
