|
|
Diana Ramirez Cifuentes, Ana Freire, Ricardo Baeza Yates, Nadia Sanz Lamora, Aida Alvarez, Alexandre Gonzalez, et al. (2021). Characterization of Anorexia Nervosa on Social Media: Textual, Visual, Relational, Behavioral, and Demographical Analysis. JMIR - Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(7), e25925.
Abstract: Background: Eating disorders are psychological conditions characterized by unhealthy eating habits. Anorexia nervosa (AN) is defined as the belief of being overweight despite being dangerously underweight. The psychological signs involve emotional and behavioral issues. There is evidence that signs and symptoms can manifest on social media, wherein both harmful and beneficial content is shared daily.
|
|
|
|
O.F.Ahmad, Y.Mori, M.Misawa, S.Kudo, J.T.Anderson, & Jorge Bernal. (2021). Establishing key research questions for the implementation of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a modified Delphi method. END - Endoscopy, 53(9), 893–901.
Abstract: BACKGROUND : Artificial intelligence (AI) research in colonoscopy is progressing rapidly but widespread clinical implementation is not yet a reality. We aimed to identify the top implementation research priorities. METHODS : An established modified Delphi approach for research priority setting was used. Fifteen international experts, including endoscopists and translational computer scientists/engineers, from nine countries participated in an online survey over 9 months. Questions related to AI implementation in colonoscopy were generated as a long-list in the first round, and then scored in two subsequent rounds to identify the top 10 research questions. RESULTS : The top 10 ranked questions were categorized into five themes. Theme 1: clinical trial design/end points (4 questions), related to optimum trial designs for polyp detection and characterization, determining the optimal end points for evaluation of AI, and demonstrating impact on interval cancer rates. Theme 2: technological developments (3 questions), including improving detection of more challenging and advanced lesions, reduction of false-positive rates, and minimizing latency. Theme 3: clinical adoption/integration (1 question), concerning the effective combination of detection and characterization into one workflow. Theme 4: data access/annotation (1 question), concerning more efficient or automated data annotation methods to reduce the burden on human experts. Theme 5: regulatory approval (1 question), related to making regulatory approval processes more efficient. CONCLUSIONS : This is the first reported international research priority setting exercise for AI in colonoscopy. The study findings should be used as a framework to guide future research with key stakeholders to accelerate the clinical implementation of AI in endoscopy.
|
|
|
|
Diego Velazquez, Pau Rodriguez, Alexandre Lacoste, Issam H. Laradji, Xavier Roca, & Jordi Gonzalez. (2023). Evaluating Counterfactual Explainers. TMLR - Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
Abstract: Explainability methods have been widely used to provide insight into the decisions made by statistical models, thus facilitating their adoption in various domains within the industry. Counterfactual explanation methods aim to improve our understanding of a model by perturbing samples in a way that would alter its response in an unexpected manner. This information is helpful for users and for machine learning practitioners to understand and improve their models. Given the value provided by counterfactual explanations, there is a growing interest in the research community to investigate and propose new methods. However, we identify two issues that could hinder the progress in this field. (1) Existing metrics do not accurately reflect the value of an explainability method for the users. (2) Comparisons between methods are usually performed with datasets like CelebA, where images are annotated with attributes that do not fully describe them and with subjective attributes such as ``Attractive''. In this work, we address these problems by proposing an evaluation method with a principled metric to evaluate and compare different counterfactual explanation methods. The evaluation method is based on a synthetic dataset where images are fully described by their annotated attributes. As a result, we are able to perform a fair comparison of multiple explainability methods in the recent literature, obtaining insights about their performance. We make the code public for the benefit of the research community.
Keywords: Explainability; Counterfactuals; XAI
|
|
|
|
Egils Avots, Meysam Madadi, Sergio Escalera, Jordi Gonzalez, Xavier Baro, Paul Pallin, et al. (2019). From 2D to 3D geodesic-based garment matching. MTAP - Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(18), 25829–25853.
Abstract: A new approach for 2D to 3D garment retexturing is proposed based on Gaussian mixture models and thin plate splines (TPS). An automatically segmented garment of an individual is matched to a new source garment and rendered, resulting in augmented images in which the target garment has been retextured using the texture of the source garment. We divide the problem into garment boundary matching based on Gaussian mixture models and then interpolate inner points using surface topology extracted through geodesic paths, which leads to a more realistic result than standard approaches. We evaluated and compared our system quantitatively by root mean square error (RMS) and qualitatively using the mean opinion score (MOS), showing the benefits of the proposed methodology on our gathered dataset.
Keywords: Shape matching; Geodesic distance; Texture mapping; RGBD image processing; Gaussian mixture model
|
|
|
|
Sergio Escalera, Jordi Gonzalez, Hugo Jair Escalante, Xavier Baro, & Isabelle Guyon. (2018). Looking at People Special Issue. IJCV - International Journal of Computer Vision, 126(2-4), 141–143.
|
|
