|
Anastasios Doulamis, Nikolaos Doulamis, Marco Bertini, Jordi Gonzalez, & Thomas B. Moeslund. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue on the Analysis and Retrieval of Events/Actions and Workflows in Video Streams. MTAP - Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(22), 14985–14990.
|
|
|
Ana Garcia Rodriguez, Yael Tudela, Henry Cordova, S. Carballal, I. Ordas, L. Moreira, et al. (2022). First in Vivo Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps using White Light Endoscopy. END - Endoscopy, 54.
|
|
|
Ana Garcia Rodriguez, Yael Tudela, Henry Cordova, S. Carballal, I. Ordas, L. Moreira, et al. (2022). In vivo computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps using white light endoscopy. ENDIO - Endoscopy International Open, 10(9), E1201–E1207.
Abstract: Background and study aims Artificial intelligence is currently able to accurately predict the histology of colorectal polyps. However, systems developed to date use complex optical technologies and have not been tested in vivo. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new deep learning-based optical diagnosis system, ATENEA, in a real clinical setting using only high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE) and to compare its performance with endoscopists. Methods ATENEA was prospectively tested in real life on consecutive polyps detected in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies at Hospital Clínic. No images were discarded, and only WLE was used. The in vivo ATENEA's prediction (adenoma vs non-adenoma) was compared with the prediction of four staff endoscopists without specific training in optical diagnosis for the study purposes. Endoscopists were blind to the ATENEA output. Histology was the gold standard. Results Ninety polyps (median size: 5 mm, range: 2-25) from 31 patients were included of which 69 (76.7 %) were adenomas. ATENEA correctly predicted the histology in 63 of 69 (91.3 %, 95 % CI: 82 %-97 %) adenomas and 12 of 21 (57.1 %, 95 % CI: 34 %-78 %) non-adenomas while endoscopists made correct predictions in 52 of 69 (75.4 %, 95 % CI: 60 %-85 %) and 20 of 21 (95.2 %, 95 % CI: 76 %-100 %), respectively. The global accuracy was 83.3 % (95 % CI: 74%-90 %) and 80 % (95 % CI: 70 %-88 %) for ATENEA and endoscopists, respectively. Conclusion ATENEA can accurately be used for in vivo characterization of colorectal polyps, enabling the endoscopist to make direct decisions. ATENEA showed a global accuracy similar to that of endoscopists despite an unsatisfactory performance for non-adenomatous lesions.
|
|
|
Albert Ali Salah, Theo Gevers, Nicu Sebe, & Alessandro Vinciarelli. (2011). Computer Vision for Ambient Intelligence. JAISE - Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 3(3), 187–191.
|
|
|
Albert Ali Salah, E. Pauwels, R. Tavenard, & Theo Gevers. (2010). T-Patterns Revisited: Mining for Temporal Patterns in Sensor Data. SENS - Sensors, 10(8), 7496–7513.
Abstract: The trend to use large amounts of simple sensors as opposed to a few complex sensors to monitor places and systems creates a need for temporal pattern mining algorithms to work on such data. The methods that try to discover re-usable and interpretable patterns in temporal event data have several shortcomings. We contrast several recent approaches to the problem, and extend the T-Pattern algorithm, which was previously applied for detection of sequential patterns in behavioural sciences. The temporal complexity of the T-pattern approach is prohibitive in the scenarios we consider. We remedy this with a statistical model to obtain a fast and robust algorithm to find patterns in temporal data. We test our algorithm on a recent database collected with passive infrared sensors with millions of events.
Keywords: sensor networks; temporal pattern extraction; T-patterns; Lempel-Ziv; Gaussian mixture model; MERL motion data
|
|