PT Journal AU Victor M. Campello Polyxeni Gkontra Cristian Izquierdo Carlos Martin-Isla Alireza Sojoudi Peter M. Full Klaus Maier-Hein Yao Zhang Zhiqiang He Jun Ma Mario Parreno Alberto Albiol Fanwei Kong Shawn C. Shadden Jorge Corral Acero Vaanathi Sundaresan Mina Saber Mustafa Elattar Hongwei Li Bjoern Menze Firas Khader Christoph Haarburger Cian M. Scannell Mitko Veta Adam Carscadden Kumaradevan Punithakumar Xiao Liu Sotirios A. Tsaftaris Xiaoqiong Huang Xin Yang Lei Li Xiahai Zhuang David Vilades Martin L. Descalzo Andrea Guala Lucia La Mura Matthias G. Friedrich Ria Garg Julie Lebel Filipe Henriques Mahir Karakas Ersin Cavus Steffen E. Petersen Sergio Escalera Santiago Segui Jose F. Rodriguez Palomares Karim Lekadir TI Multi-Centre, Multi-Vendor and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation: The M&Ms Challenge SO IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging JI TMI PY 2021 BP 3543 EP 3554 VL 40 IS 12 DI 10.1109/TMI.2021.3090082 AB The emergence of deep learning has considerably advanced the state-of-the-art in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) segmentation. Many techniques have been proposed over the last few years, bringing the accuracy of automated segmentation close to human performance. However, these models have been all too often trained and validated using cardiac imaging samples from single clinical centres or homogeneous imaging protocols. This has prevented the development and validation of models that are generalizable across different clinical centres, imaging conditions or scanner vendors. To promote further research and scientific benchmarking in the field of generalizable deep learning for cardiac segmentation, this paper presents the results of the Multi-Centre, Multi-Vendor and Multi-Disease Cardiac Segmentation (M&Ms) Challenge, which was recently organized as part of the MICCAI 2020 Conference. A total of 14 teams submitted different solutions to the problem, combining various baseline models, data augmentation strategies, and domain adaptation techniques. The obtained results indicate the importance of intensity-driven data augmentation, as well as the need for further research to improve generalizability towards unseen scanner vendors or new imaging protocols. Furthermore, we present a new resource of 375 heterogeneous CMR datasets acquired by using four different scanner vendors in six hospitals and three different countries (Spain, Canada and Germany), which we provide as open-access for the community to enable future research in the field. ER