|
|
Antonio Lopez, Ernest Valveny and Juan J. Villanueva. 2005. Real-time quality control of surgical material packaging by artificial vision. Assembly Automation, 25(3).
|
|
|
|
A. Restrepo, Angel Sappa and M. Devy. 2005. Edge registration versus triangular mesh registration, a comparative study.
|
|
|
|
Jaume Amores and Petia Radeva. 2005. Registration and Retrieval of Highly Elastic Bodies using Contextual Information. PRL, 26(11), 1720–1731.
|
|
|
|
Jaume Amores and Petia Radeva. 2005. Retrieval of IVUS Images Using Contextual Information and Elastic Matching.
|
|
|
|
Angel Sappa. 2006. Unsupervised Contour Closure Algorithm for Range Image Edge-Based Segmentation.
|
|
|
|
Jaume Amores, N. Sebe and Petia Radeva. 2006. Boosting the distance estimation: Application to the K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier. PRL, 27(3), 201–209.
|
|
|
|
Angel Sappa, David Geronimo, Fadi Dornaika and Antonio Lopez. 2006. On-board camera extrinsic parameter estimation. EL, 42(13), 745–746.
Abstract: An efficient technique for real-time estimation of camera extrinsic parameters is presented. It is intended to be used on on-board vision systems for driving assistance applications. The proposed technique is based on the use of a commercial stereo vision system that does not need any visual feature extraction.
|
|
|
|
Jaume Amores. 2013. Multiple Instance Classification: review, taxonomy and comparative study. AI, 201, 81–105.
Abstract: Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has become an important topic in the pattern recognition community, and many solutions to this problemhave been proposed until now. Despite this fact, there is a lack of comparative studies that shed light into the characteristics and behavior of the different methods. In this work we provide such an analysis focused on the classification task (i.e.,leaving out other learning tasks such as regression). In order to perform our study, we implemented
fourteen methods grouped into three different families. We analyze the performance of the approaches across a variety of well-known databases, and we also study their behavior in synthetic scenarios in order to highlight their characteristics. As a result of this analysis, we conclude that methods that extract global bag-level information show a clearly superior performance in general. In this sense, the analysis permits us to understand why some types of methods are more successful than others, and it permits us to establish guidelines in the design of new MIL
methods.
Keywords: Multi-instance learning; Codebook; Bag-of-Words
|
|
|
|
Angel Sappa. 2006. Splitting up Panoramic Range Images into Compact 2½D Representations.
|
|
|
|
Jaume Amores. 2015. MILDE: multiple instance learning by discriminative embedding. KAIS, 42(2), 381–407.
Abstract: While the objective of the standard supervised learning problem is to classify feature vectors, in the multiple instance learning problem, the objective is to classify bags, where each bag contains multiple feature vectors. This represents a generalization of the standard problem, and this generalization becomes necessary in many real applications such as drug activity prediction, content-based image retrieval, and others. While the existing paradigms are based on learning the discriminant information either at the instance level or at the bag level, we propose to incorporate both levels of information. This is done by defining a discriminative embedding of the original space based on the responses of cluster-adapted instance classifiers. Results clearly show the advantage of the proposed method over the state of the art, where we tested the performance through a variety of well-known databases that come from real problems, and we also included an analysis of the performance using synthetically generated data.
Keywords: Multi-instance learning; Codebook; Bag of words
|
|
