|
F. Lopez, J.M. Valiente, Ramon Baldrich, & Maria Vanrell. (2005). Fast surface grading using color statistics in the CIELab space. In LNCS 1: 666–673.
|
|
|
Xavier Otazu, & Maria Vanrell. (2006). Several lightness induction effects with a computational multiresolution wavelet framework. 29th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP’06), Perception Suppl s, 32: 56–56.
|
|
|
Eduard Vazquez, Francesc Tous, Ramon Baldrich, & Maria Vanrell. (2006). n-Dimensional Distribution Reduction Preserving its Structure. In Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, M. Polit et al. (Eds.), 146: 167–175.
|
|
|
Eduard Vazquez, Ramon Baldrich, Javier Vazquez, & Maria Vanrell. (2007). Topological histogram reduction towards colour segmentation. In 3rd Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IbPRIA 2007), J. Marti et al. (Eds.) LNCS 4477:55–62.
|
|
|
Javier Vazquez, Maria Vanrell, Anna Salvatella, & Eduard Vazquez. (2007). A colour space based on the image content. In Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, C. Angulo and L. Godo, pp 205–212 IOS Press.
|
|
|
Xavier Otazu, Maria Vanrell, & C. Alejandro Parraga. (2007). Mutiresolution Wavelet Framework Reproduces Induction Effects. Perception 36:167–167, supp.
|
|
|
C. Alejandro Parraga, Robert Benavente, & Maria Vanrell. (2007). Modeling Colour-Naming Space with Fuzzy Sets. Perception 36:198–198, supp.
|
|
|
Xavier Otazu, Maria Vanrell, & C. Alejandro Parraga. (2008). Multiresolution Wavelet Framework Models Brightness Induction Effects. VR - Vision Research, 733–751.
|
|
|
Robert Benavente, Maria Vanrell, & Ramon Baldrich. (2008). Parametric Fuzzy Sets for Automatic Color Naming. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2582–2593.
|
|
|
Eduard Vazquez, & Maria Vanrell. (2008). Eines per al desenvolupament de competencies de enginyeria en un assignatura de Intel·ligencia Artificial.
|
|
|
Xavier Otazu, Maria Vanrell, & C. Alejandro Parraga. (2008). Colour induction effects are modelled by a low-level multiresolution wavelet framework. Perception 37(Suppl.): 107.
|
|
C. Alejandro Parraga, Robert Benavente, Maria Vanrell, & Ramon Baldrich. (2009). Psychophysical measurements to model inter-colour regions of colour-naming space. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 53(3), 031106 (8 pages).
Abstract: JCR Impact Factor 2009: 0.391
In this paper, we present a fuzzy-set of parametric functions which segment the CIE lab space into eleven regions which correspond to the group of common universal categories present in all evolved languages as identified by anthropologists and linguists. The set of functions is intended to model a color-name assignment task by humans and differs from other models in its emphasis on the inter-color boundary regions, which were explicitly measured by means of a psychophysics experiment. In our particular implementation, the CIE lab space was segmented into eleven color categories using a Triple Sigmoid as the fuzzy sets basis, whose parameters are included in this paper. The model’s parameters were adjusted according to the psychophysical results of a yes/no discrimination paradigm where observers had to choose (English) names for isoluminant colors belonging to regions in-between neighboring categories. These colors were presented on a calibrated CRT monitor (14-bit x 3 precision). The experimental results show that inter- color boundary regions are much less defined than expected and color samples other than those near the most representatives are needed to define the position and shape of boundaries between categories. The extended set of model parameters is given as a table.
Keywords: image processing; Analysis
|
|
Javier Vazquez, C. Alejandro Parraga, Maria Vanrell, & Ramon Baldrich. (2009). Color Constancy Algorithms: Psychophysical Evaluation on a New Dataset. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 53(3), 031105–9.
Abstract: The estimation of the illuminant of a scene from a digital image has been the goal of a large amount of research in computer vision. Color constancy algorithms have dealt with this problem by defining different heuristics to select a unique solution from within the feasible set. The performance of these algorithms has shown that there is still a long way to go to globally solve this problem as a preliminary step in computer vision. In general, performance evaluation has been done by comparing the angular error between the estimated chromaticity and the chromaticity of a canonical illuminant, which is highly dependent on the image dataset. Recently, some workers have used high-level constraints to estimate illuminants; in this case selection is based on increasing the performance on the subsequent steps of the systems. In this paper we propose a new performance measure, the perceptual angular error. It evaluates the performance of a color constancy algorithm according to the perceptual preferences of humans, or naturalness (instead of the actual optimal solution) and is independent of the visual task. We show the results of a new psychophysical experiment comparing solutions from three different color constancy algorithms. Our results show that in more than a half of the judgments the preferred solution is not the one closest to the optimal solution. Our experiments were performed on a new dataset of images acquired with a calibrated camera with an attached neutral grey sphere, which better copes with the illuminant variations of the scene.
|
|
Javier Vazquez, C. Alejandro Parraga, & Maria Vanrell. (2009). Ordinal pairwise method for natural images comparison. PER - Perception, 38, 180.
Abstract: 38(Suppl.)ECVP Abstract Supplement
We developed a new psychophysical method to compare different colour appearance models when applied to natural scenes. The method was as follows: two images (processed by different algorithms) were displayed on a CRT monitor and observers were asked to select the most natural of them. The original images were gathered by means of a calibrated trichromatic digital camera and presented one on top of the other on a calibrated screen. The selection was made by pressing on a 6-button IR box, which allowed observers to consider not only the most natural but to rate their selection. The rating system allowed observers to register how much more natural was their chosen image (eg, much more, definitely more, slightly more), which gave us valuable extra information on the selection process. The results were analysed considering both the selection as a binary choice (using Thurstone's law of comparative judgement) and using Bradley-Terry method for ordinal comparison. Our results show a significant difference in the rating scales obtained. Although this method has been used in colour constancy algorithm comparisons, its uses are much wider, eg to compare algorithms of image compression, rendering, recolouring, etc.
|
|
