<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
	<mods version="3.2">
		<titleInfo>
			<title>Unsupervised wall detector in architectural floor plan</title>
		</titleInfo>
		<name type="personal">
			<namePart type="family">Lluis Pere de las Heras</namePart>
			<role>
				<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
			</role>
		</name>
		<name type="personal">
			<namePart type="family">David Fernandez</namePart>
			<role>
				<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
			</role>
		</name>
		<name type="personal">
			<namePart type="family">Ernest Valveny</namePart>
			<role>
				<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
			</role>
		</name>
		<name type="personal">
			<namePart type="family">Josep Llados</namePart>
			<role>
				<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
			</role>
		</name>
		<name type="personal">
			<namePart type="family">Gemma Sanchez</namePart>
			<role>
				<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
			</role>
		</name>
		<originInfo>
			<dateIssued>2013</dateIssued>
		</originInfo>
		<abstract>Wall detection in floor plans is a crucial step in a complete floor plan recognition system. Walls define the main structure of buildings and convey essential information for the detection of other structural elements. Nevertheless, wall segmentation is a difficult task, mainly because of the lack of a standard graphical notation. The existing approaches are restricted to small group of similar notations or require the existence of pre-annotated corpus of input images to learn each new notation. In this paper we present an automatic wall segmentation system, with the ability to handle completely different notations without the need of any annotated dataset. It only takes advantage of the general knowledge that walls are a repetitive element, naturally distributed within the plan and commonly modeled by straight parallel lines. The method has been tested on four datasets of real floor plans with different notations, and compared with the state-of-the-art. The results show its suitability for different graphical notations, achieving higher recall rates than the rest of the methods while keeping a high average precision.</abstract>
		<note>DAG; 600.061; 600.056; 600.045</note>
		<note>exported from refbase (http://refbase.cvc.uab.es/show.php?record=2319), last updated on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:11:13 +0100</note>
		<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
		<location>
			<url displayLabel="Electronic full text" access="raw object">http://refbase.cvc.uab.es/files/HFV2013.pdf</url>
		</location>
		<identifier type="doi">10.1109/ICDAR.2013.252</identifier>
		<identifier type="local">Admin @ si @ HFV2013</identifier>
		<relatedItem type="host">
			<titleInfo>
				<title>12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition</title>
			</titleInfo>
			<name type="conference">
				<namePart>ICDAR</namePart>
			</name>
			<originInfo>
				<dateIssued>2013</dateIssued>
			</originInfo>
			<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
			<part>
				<extent unit="page">
					<start>1245</start>
					<end>1249</end>
				</extent>
			</part>
			<identifier type="issn">1520-5363</identifier>
		</relatedItem>
	</mods>
</modsCollection>