|
Oriol Ramos Terrades, Ernest Valveny and Salvatore Tabbone. 2007. On the Combination of Ridgelets Descriptors for Symbol Recognition. Seventh IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition.18–20.
|
|
|
Alicia Fornes, Josep Llados and Gemma Sanchez. 2007. Old Handwritten Musical Symbol Classification by a Dynamic Time Warping Based Method. Seventh IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition.26–27.
|
|
|
Jose Antonio Rodriguez, Gemma Sanchez and Josep Llados. 2007. Categorization of Digital Ink Elements using Spectral Features. Seventh IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition.63–64.
|
|
|
Ernest Valveny, Salvatore Tabbone, Oriol Ramos Terrades and Emilie Jean-Marie Odile. 2007. Performance Characterization of Shape Descriptors for Symbol Representation. Seventh IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition.82–83.
|
|
|
Alicia Fornes, Sergio Escalera, Josep Llados and Gemma Sanchez. 2007. Symbol Recognition by Multi-class Blurred Shape Models. Seventh IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition.11–13.
|
|
|
Liu Wenyin, Josep Llados and Jean-Marc Ogier. 2008. Graphics Recognition. Recent Advances and New Opportunities.. (LNCS.)
|
|
|
Alicia Fornes, Josep Llados, Gemma Sanchez and Horst Bunke. 2009. Symbol-independent writer identification in old handwritten music scores. In proceedings of 8th IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 186–197.
|
|
|
Salim Jouili, Salvatore Tabbone and Ernest Valveny. 2009. Evaluation of graph matching measures for documents retrieval. In proceedings of 8th IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition.13–21.
Abstract: In this paper we evaluate four graph distance measures. The analysis is performed for document retrieval tasks. For this aim, different kind of documents are used which include line drawings (symbols), ancient documents (ornamental letters), shapes and trademark-logos. The experimental results show that the performance of each grahp distance measure depends on the kind of data and the graph representation technique.
Keywords: Graph Matching; Graph retrieval; structural representation; Performance Evaluation
|
|
|
Joan Mas, Gemma Sanchez and Josep Llados. 2009. SSP: Sketching slide Presentations, a Syntactic Approach. 8th IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition.
Abstract: The design of a slide presentation is a creative process. In this process first, humans visualize in their minds what they want to explain. Then, they have to be able to represent this knowledge in an understandable way. There exists a lot of commercial software that allows to create our own slide presentations but the creativity of the user is rather limited. In this article we present an application that allows the user to create and visualize a slide presentation from a sketch. A slide may be seen as a graphical document or a diagram where its elements are placed in a particular spatial arrangement. To describe and recognize slides a syntactic approach is proposed. This approach is based on an Adjacency Grammar and a parsing methodology to cope with this kind of grammars. The experimental evaluation shows the performance of our methodology from a qualitative and a quantitative point of view. Six different slides containing different number of symbols, from 4 to 7, have been given to the users and they have drawn them without restrictions in the order of the elements. The quantitative results give an idea on how suitable is our methodology to describe and recognize the different elements in a slide.
|
|
|
Salim Jouili, Salvatore Tabbone and Ernest Valveny. 2009. Comparing Graph Similarity Measures for Graphical Recognition. 8th IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition. Springer. (LNCS.)
Abstract: In this paper we evaluate four graph distance measures. The analysis is performed for document retrieval tasks. For this aim, different kind of documents are used including line drawings (symbols), ancient documents (ornamental letters), shapes and trademark-logos. The experimental results show that the performance of each graph distance measure depends on the kind of data and the graph representation technique.
|
|