|
|
R. Clariso, David Masip, & A. Rius. (2014). Student projects empowering mobile learning in higher education. RUSC - Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 192–207.
|
|
|
|
Xavier Baro, Sergio Escalera, Jordi Vitria, Oriol Pujol, & Petia Radeva. (2009). Traffic Sign Recognition Using Evolutionary Adaboost Detection and Forest-ECOC Classification. TITS - IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 10(1), 113–126.
Abstract: The high variability of sign appearance in uncontrolled environments has made the detection and classification of road signs a challenging problem in computer vision. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for the detection and classification of traffic signs. Detection is based on a boosted detectors cascade, trained with a novel evolutionary version of Adaboost, which allows the use of large feature spaces. Classification is defined as a multiclass categorization problem. A battery of classifiers is trained to split classes in an Error-Correcting Output Code (ECOC) framework. We propose an ECOC design through a forest of optimal tree structures that are embedded in the ECOC matrix. The novel system offers high performance and better accuracy than the state-of-the-art strategies and is potentially better in terms of noise, affine deformation, partial occlusions, and reduced illumination.
|
|
|
|
Maria Vanrell, Jordi Vitria, & Xavier Roca. (1997). A multidimensional scaling approach to explore the behavior of a texture perception algorithm. Machine Vision and Applications, 9, 262–271.
|
|
|
|
David Masip, Michael S. North, Alexander Todorov, & Daniel N. Osherson. (2014). Automated Prediction of Preferences Using Facial Expressions. Plos - PloS one, 9(2), e87434.
Abstract: We introduce a computer vision problem from social cognition, namely, the automated detection of attitudes from a person's spontaneous facial expressions. To illustrate the challenges, we introduce two simple algorithms designed to predict observers’ preferences between images (e.g., of celebrities) based on covert videos of the observers’ faces. The two algorithms are almost as accurate as human judges performing the same task but nonetheless far from perfect. Our approach is to locate facial landmarks, then predict preference on the basis of their temporal dynamics. The database contains 768 videos involving four different kinds of preferences. We make it publically available.
|
|
|
|
Mario Rojas, David Masip, A. Todorov, & Jordi Vitria. (2011). Automatic Prediction of Facial Trait Judgments: Appearance vs. Structural Models. Plos - PloS one, 6(8), e23323.
Abstract: JCR Impact Factor 2010: 4.411
Evaluating other individuals with respect to personality characteristics plays a crucial role in human relations and it is the focus of attention for research in diverse fields such as psychology and interactive computer systems. In psychology, face perception has been recognized as a key component of this evaluation system. Multiple studies suggest that observers use face information to infer personality characteristics. Interactive computer systems are trying to take advantage of these findings and apply them to increase the natural aspect of interaction and to improve the performance of interactive computer systems. Here, we experimentally test whether the automatic prediction of facial trait judgments (e.g. dominance) can be made by using the full appearance information of the face and whether a reduced representation of its structure is sufficient. We evaluate two separate approaches: a holistic representation model using the facial appearance information and a structural model constructed from the relations among facial salient points. State of the art machine learning methods are applied to a) derive a facial trait judgment model from training data and b) predict a facial trait value for any face. Furthermore, we address the issue of whether there are specific structural relations among facial points that predict perception of facial traits. Experimental results over a set of labeled data (9 different trait evaluations) and classification rules (4 rules) suggest that a) prediction of perception of facial traits is learnable by both holistic and structural approaches; b) the most reliable prediction of facial trait judgments is obtained by certain type of holistic descriptions of the face appearance; and c) for some traits such as attractiveness and extroversion, there are relationships between specific structural features and social perceptions
|
|
